hiltroulette.blogg.se

J Crustac Biol 10:469–478įletcher GL, Hew CL, Davies PL (2001) Antifreeze proteins of teleost fishes. PLoS One 6, e22913ĭougherty WJ (1990) Barnacle adhesion: reattachment of the adult barnacle Chthamalus fragilis Darwin to polystyrene surfaces followed by centrifugational shearing. Biofouling 30:799–812Ĭhen ZF, Matsumura K, Wang H, Arellano SM, Yan X, Alam I, Archer JA, Bajic VB, Qian PY (2011) Toward an understanding of the molecular mechanisms of barnacle larval settlement: a comparative transcriptomic approach. Langmuir 28:13364–13372īurden DK, Spillmann CM, Everett RK, Barlow DE, Orihuela B, Deschamps JR, Fears KP, Rittschof D, Wahl KJ (2014) Growth and development of the barnacle Amphibalanus amphitrite: time and spatially resolved structure and chemistry of the base plate. J Adhesion Sci Technol 15:1485–1502īurden DK, Barlow DE, Spillmann CM, Orihuela B, Rittschof D, Everett RK, Wahl KJ (2012) Barnacle Balanus amphitrite adheres by a stepwise cementing process. Langmuir 26:6549–6556īerglin M, Larsson A, Jonsson PR, Gatenholm P (2001) The adhesion of the barnacle, Balanus improvisus, to poly(dimethylsiloxane) fouling-release coatings and poly(methyl methacrylate) panels: the effect of barnacle size on strength and failure mode. Biofouling 25:359–366īarlow DE, Dickinson GH, Orihuela B, Kulp JL 3rd, Rittschof D, Wahl KJ (2010) Characterization of the adhesive plaque of the barnacle Balanus amphitrite: amyloid-like nanofibrils are a major component. Biofouling 6:165–180īarlow DE, Dickinson GH, Orihuela B, Rittschof D, Wahl KJ (2009) In situ ATR-FTIR characterization of primary cement interfaces of the barnacle Balanus amphitrite. PLoS One 8, e68085īaier RE, Meyer AE (1992) Surface analysis of fouling-resistant marine coatings. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3:2085–2091Īldred N, Høeg JT, Maruzzo D, Clare AS (2013) Analysis of the behaviours mediating barnacle cyprid reversible adhesion. Biofouling 24:351–363Īldred N, Ekblad T, Andersson O, Liedberg B, Clare AS (2011) Real-time quantification of microscale bioadhesion events in situ using imaging surface plasmon resonance (iSPR). Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 53:11253–11256Īldred N, Clare AS (2008) The adhesive strategies of cyprids and development of barnacle-resistant marine coatings. Nat Commun 6:8663Īkdogan Y, Wei W, Huang KY, Kageyama Y, Danner EW, Miller DR, Martinez Rodriguez NR, Waite JH, Han S (2014) Intrinsic surface-drying properties of bioadhesive proteins. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.Īhn BK, Das S, Linstadt R, Kaufman Y, Martinez-Rodriguez NR, Mirshafian R, Kesselman E, Talmon Y, Lipshutz BH, Israelachvili JN, Waite JH (2015) High-performance mussel-inspired adhesives of reduced complexity. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. Perspectives in material science are also discussed. This chapter summarizes barnacle underwater attachment and the adhesive. Thus, the molecular mechanism of the adhesion should be a result balanced on the complex physiology of the animal. In particular, barnacle adhesion is a physiological complex of events involved with molting, epicuticular membrane development, calcification of the shell, and secretion of the underwater adhesive. The chemical structures and chemistry are actually substantially different from those of two other models, mussel byssus and tube-dwelling worm cement. The multi-protein complex handles the multifunctionality of this underwater attachment, which is based on a different design from those of man-made adhesives in chemistry, structures, processing, and physics. The adult firmly attaches its base to a foreign surface in the water via an underwater adhesive called cement.

The barnacle, infraclass Cirripedia, is the only sessile crustacean.